TransCanada Proposes Second Oil Pipeline
by Art Hovey
|
Lincoln Journal-Star | Wednesday, June 11, 2008 | 8:00 PM EST
The project would connect with the Keystone pipeline already
being built.
Representatives of TransCanada were expected to brief Fillmore County, Neb., commissioners Thursday on the possibility of building part of a proposed $7 billion oil pipeline through the Geneva area.
The project is meant to connect with a $5.2 billion Keystone pipeline already under construction from the oil sands region of Alberta through eastern Nebraska to delivery points in Illinois and Oklahoma.
Company spokesman Jeff Rauh stressed Monday the second project, originating in the same area in Canada and joining with the first one in Jefferson County, does not have the green light yet from TransCanada management.
However, "we do believe that this is a project that is likely to go forward. And, if it were not, we would not be taking these steps," Rauh said.
The latest proposal to bring more Canadian oil to the U.S. could offer encouraging news to drivers confronting $4 gas.
According to the most optimistic estimates, the Canadian oil sands are believed to contain oil deposits comparable to those in Saudi Arabia, but the resource must be separated from sand deposits and is more difficult to refine.
If the second pipeline proceeds, it would extend beyond Oklahoma to the Gulf Coast and Port Arthur, Texas.
As another preliminary step in Nebraska, open houses have been scheduled in five communities, including York and Fairbury, in early July.
Fillmore County Clerk Amy Nelson said the company didn't provide advance details on its presentation to commissioners in Geneva Thursday, but Rauh characterized that session and others planned with other county governments as "just to provide an overview of activities we're engaged in in their areas."
As was the case with the first project, expected to reach the full construction stage across Nebraska next year, the second carries some big numbers. Among them:
* A 1,980-mile path for a 36-inch pipe buried 4 feet under the ground from Hardesty, Alberta, to an end point near Houston, Texas.
* A permanent easement 50 feet wide entering north-central Nebraska and proceeding diagonally to Jefferson County. The clock starts ticking on the tentative construction timetable for the second project in 2010.
Rauh said contacts with communities in Nebraska and other states suggest "the developers feel comfortable about committing the resources to keep the project moving forward."
"However," he added, "it's still a possibility, given no signature on the bottom line for shippers on the project, that, until the shippers are in place, the project could fall apart."
The first project, now in the construction stage in North Dakota, is scheduled to enter Nebraska near Yankton, S.D., and to go through 10 Nebraska counties on its way south.
Peter Lidiak, director of the American Petroleum Institute's petroleum segment, said TransCanada is one of several Canadian companies strengthening its energy connection with the U.S.
"The important thing is we're looking to secure reliable supplies that provide stability in energy sources," Lidiak said from Washington, D.C. "And increased use of pipelines to bring oil from Canada, which is a close ally and a friendly country to the U.S., is just that. It produces stability and better reliability."
Lidiak said Canada is already a major supplier to the U.S. "The projections I've seen tell me that Canadian oil production could go from 1.1 million barrels (per day) to 4.4 million in 2020."
Rauh said there is no business connection between what TransCanada is doing and plans for a major oil refinery in southeast South Dakota.
However, "it's the same development of oil in Canada that has driven the need for the Keystone pipeline and the evaluation of the second project and is likely influencing the location of the refinery in South Dakota."
(C) 2008 Lincoln Journal-Star. via ProQuest Information and Learning Company; All Rights Reserved
Representatives of TransCanada were expected to brief Fillmore County, Neb., commissioners Thursday on the possibility of building part of a proposed $7 billion oil pipeline through the Geneva area.
The project is meant to connect with a $5.2 billion Keystone pipeline already under construction from the oil sands region of Alberta through eastern Nebraska to delivery points in Illinois and Oklahoma.
Company spokesman Jeff Rauh stressed Monday the second project, originating in the same area in Canada and joining with the first one in Jefferson County, does not have the green light yet from TransCanada management.
However, "we do believe that this is a project that is likely to go forward. And, if it were not, we would not be taking these steps," Rauh said.
The latest proposal to bring more Canadian oil to the U.S. could offer encouraging news to drivers confronting $4 gas.
According to the most optimistic estimates, the Canadian oil sands are believed to contain oil deposits comparable to those in Saudi Arabia, but the resource must be separated from sand deposits and is more difficult to refine.
If the second pipeline proceeds, it would extend beyond Oklahoma to the Gulf Coast and Port Arthur, Texas.
As another preliminary step in Nebraska, open houses have been scheduled in five communities, including York and Fairbury, in early July.
Fillmore County Clerk Amy Nelson said the company didn't provide advance details on its presentation to commissioners in Geneva Thursday, but Rauh characterized that session and others planned with other county governments as "just to provide an overview of activities we're engaged in in their areas."
As was the case with the first project, expected to reach the full construction stage across Nebraska next year, the second carries some big numbers. Among them:
* A 1,980-mile path for a 36-inch pipe buried 4 feet under the ground from Hardesty, Alberta, to an end point near Houston, Texas.
* A permanent easement 50 feet wide entering north-central Nebraska and proceeding diagonally to Jefferson County. The clock starts ticking on the tentative construction timetable for the second project in 2010.
Rauh said contacts with communities in Nebraska and other states suggest "the developers feel comfortable about committing the resources to keep the project moving forward."
"However," he added, "it's still a possibility, given no signature on the bottom line for shippers on the project, that, until the shippers are in place, the project could fall apart."
The first project, now in the construction stage in North Dakota, is scheduled to enter Nebraska near Yankton, S.D., and to go through 10 Nebraska counties on its way south.
Peter Lidiak, director of the American Petroleum Institute's petroleum segment, said TransCanada is one of several Canadian companies strengthening its energy connection with the U.S.
"The important thing is we're looking to secure reliable supplies that provide stability in energy sources," Lidiak said from Washington, D.C. "And increased use of pipelines to bring oil from Canada, which is a close ally and a friendly country to the U.S., is just that. It produces stability and better reliability."
Lidiak said Canada is already a major supplier to the U.S. "The projections I've seen tell me that Canadian oil production could go from 1.1 million barrels (per day) to 4.4 million in 2020."
Rauh said there is no business connection between what TransCanada is doing and plans for a major oil refinery in southeast South Dakota.
However, "it's the same development of oil in Canada that has driven the need for the Keystone pipeline and the evaluation of the second project and is likely influencing the location of the refinery in South Dakota."
(C) 2008 Lincoln Journal-Star. via ProQuest Information and Learning Company; All Rights Reserved
Most Popular Articles
- ExxonMobil Racks Up Discoveries in Guyana Block Eyed by Chevron
- Oil Market Sentiment Has Improved Significantly
- EU, US Eye Collaboration on Nuclear Materials
- USA Driving Activity to Increase to All-Time Highs
- EU Electricity Export to Ukraine Up 94 Percent in Two Years
- China Coal Output Falls for First Time since Government Ordered More
- TC Energy to Sell Prince Rupert Gas Pipeline Project to First Nation
- BP Pulse Buys One of Europe's Largest Truck Stops
- UK CCUS Plans Outdated: Think Tank
- I Squared Eyes Full Ownership of Europe Gas Storage Firm
- Norway Regulator Blasts Proposal to Halt New Oil and Gas Permits
- Chinese Mega Company Makes Major Oilfield Discovery
- EIA Drops 2024 Henry Hub Gas Price Forecast
- EIA and Standard Chartered Offer Up Latest Oil Price Predictions
- Red Sea Region Sees Another Watershed Incident
- Chevron Oil Project in Kazakhstan to Cost $48.5B
- OPEC Voices Encouragement after IEA Affirms Support for Oil Security
- Biden Govt Bares Strategy for Freight Charging, Hydrogen Fueling Infra
- Ukraine Hits Third Russian Refinery In Escalating Drone Strikes
- Rystad Looks at the Buzz Around White Hydrogen
- VIDEO: Missile Attack Kills Crew Transiting Gulf of Aden
- Norway Regulator Blasts Proposal to Halt New Oil and Gas Permits
- Chinese Mega Company Makes Major Oilfield Discovery
- What Is the Biggest Risk to Offshore Oil and Gas Personnel in 2024?
- Is Peak Oil Demand Close?
- Vessel Sinks in Red Sea After Missile Strike
- JP Morgan, Standard Chartered Reveal Latest Oil Price Forecasts
- Exxon Rights in Stabroek Do Not Apply to Hess Merger with Chevron: Hess
- Rystad Forecasts Net Production of Top Permian Producers in 2024
- Analysts Reveal Latest Oil Price Outlook Following OPEC+ Cut Extension